GVC made another offer for Ladbrokes despite FOBTs review

By: Sarah O'Brien
- August 22, 2017
- LikeUnlikeLike
- 1266 Views
Ladbrokes Coral has reportedly rejected a £3.6 billion takeover offer from online gambling group, GVC.
But two insiders have revealed the bid, which would have created one of the world’s biggest gambling companies, is no longer active.
According to the insiders, the discussions failed to eventuate due to a disagreement over the value of each company.
Given the UK government’s impending review of the gambling industry, including a crackdown on the Fixed Odds Betting Terminals (FOBTs), GVC’s proposal reportedly valued Ladbrokes Coral at roughly 140p per share, or £2.7 billion.
However, the online company apparently also proposed an increase of 50p per share if the regulatory review produced a positive outcome.
Ladbrokes Coral has around 3500 high street shops which feature FOBTs. If British lawmakers and anti-gambling groups get their way, the maximum betting stakes will be reduced from £100 to £2. Analysts have estimated that Ladbrokes Coral would incur a £449 million loss in machine revenues in 2018 if the government enforces the reforms.
It’s not the first time GVC has presented an offer to Ladbrokes. The Isle of Man company proposed a tie-up with Ladbrokes last year, but the bookmaker was in the midst of completing a £2.2 billion merger with Coral.
GVC has been proactive in seeking out potential deals including the acquisition of Bwin in 2015. The international company, which also owns Sportingbet, beat out 888 Holdings with a £1.1 billion offer.
It’s not clear if GVC will present another offer following the impending regulatory review expected to take place in the coming months.
Fresh calls for reduction in FOBTs maximum stakes
The fight to reduce the maximum bet stakes on machines located in UK high street shops has been ongoing for quite some time. But a new report published by the Centre for Social Justice (CSJ) think tank reignited the debate on the regulatory change. It states the reduction will reduce social harms caused by problem gambling.
The Association of British Bookmakers (ABB) has released its response to the new report, labelling the CSJ’s research as inaccurate in a post on the Conservative Home website.
“It is unfortunate that an influential think-tank such as the Centre for Social Justice (CJS) produced a report that includes so much inaccurate and misleading information about gaming machines in betting shops,” the post reads.
“Had the CSJ considered the numerous official, independently verified third party reports and evidence on gaming machines they would have written a very different report.”
The ABB, which is responsible for the rights of off-course bookmakers, also details the detrimental impacts of reducing the stake by such a huge amount including the loss of 21,000 betting shop employees.
The trade group pointed out that the problem gambling rates cited in the CSJ report are incomplete since they do not include the fact that the statistics have remained stable since the machines were first introduced.
The ABB also referred to research performed by NatCen which states that ‘focusing on one element of gambling alone—such as the reduction of stake size—will not provide a better prediction of problem gambling or decrease the rates of gambling harm.”
“It is disappointing that the CSJ did not research all the evidence available,” the ABB states at the end of the post.
“We hope that in future, the CSJ reaches out beyond those with their pre-determined views on FOBTs and explore the evidence before reaching their conclusions.”
You may also like
Join the Betting Planet team!
Are you passionate about sports betting? Tipsters and news writers required TODAY!
Experienced preferred but not essential. (All apps considered).
View Careers at Race Media

Top Online Casinos
Latest Betting News
- Liverpool, Spurs rescue acts close out super EPL weekend
- Cincinnati Bengals at Jacksonville Jaguars NFL Monday betting picks
- NFL Sunday betting picks & best odds – December 3, 2023
- BKFC56: Perry vs Alvarez fight card preview, betting picks & odds
- UFC Fight Night Austin main card preview & top betting picks
- EPL Matchweek 14 betting picks & goalscorer predictions
- Dariush v Tsarukyan betting picks & odds – UFC Fight Night Austin
- La Liga Matchday 15 betting preview, top picks & best odds
- Seahawks @ Cowboys NFL Thursday betting picks – November 30, 2023
- Champions League Wednesday betting picks – Matchday 5
Casino Guides
- Safest online casino jurisdictions
- How to guides
- How to win at pokies
- How to play online pokies
- PaysafeCard online casino deposits
- MasterCard Online Casinos
- Online Casinos Accepting POLi
- 32Red Casino Review
- All Slots Casino Review
- Boombet Casino review
- Horse racing games at casinos
- Credit card deposits at online casinos
- Films about blackjack
- Live dealer casinos
- How to play live dealer blackjack party
- Online Blackjack
- Top online casinos 2023
- Online casino deposits
- MasterCard Online Casinos
- Online Casinos Accepting POLi
- PaysafeCard online casino deposits
- Online slots
- Playing Pai Gow Poker on the Internet
- Online keno
- Online poker
- Online poker tournament structures
- Real money online roulette 2022
- Online multi-wheel roulette – what is it?
- How to play online scratch cards in 2020
- Sit & Go online poker tournaments
- Skrill e-wallet deposits at online casinos
- Visa online casino deposits
Sports Betting Guides
Casino Games
Deposits & Withdrawals
Football
Basketball
Top Country Betting sites
- Angola
- Antigua and Barbuda
- Armenia
- Australia
- Azerbaijan
- Bahamas
- Barbados
- Belize
- Brazil
- Canada
- Dominican Republic
- Germany
- Ghana
- Grenada
- India
- Indonesia
- Italy
- Kenya
- Malaysia
- Malta
- Ireland
- Netherlands
- New Zealand
- Nigeria
- Norway
- Philippines
- Singapore
- South Africa
- Turkey
- Uganda
- Ukraine
- United Kingdom
- Vietnam
- Zambia
- Zimbabwe